NCATE Review Report on Association Standards Summarized Findings
ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL

Name of Institution
 ______________________________________
Date of Review
 _______________________
State
 _________

Location:
 _________
Main Campus
 _________
Alternative Location

Review Type:
 _________
Initial
 _________
Rejoinder

Name of Program Reviewed:
 ____________________
Grades Levels Prepared For:
 ___________________

Clasification:

______
Elementary Education
______
Combined (specify):____________________
______
Elementary/Special Education
______
Elementary/Early Childhood
______
Elementary/______________

Level:

______
Baccalaureate
______
Post-Baccalaureate, Initial
______
Master's Initial

Part I: Analysis of the Evidence Provided for Each Standard:

(Comments added for each standard not met or for noteworthy items)

Standard 1: Development, Learning, and Motivation:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2a: Central Concept, Tools of Inquiry, and Structures of Content:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2b: English Language Arts:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2c: Science:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2d: Mathematics:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2e: Social Studies:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2f: The Arts:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2g: Health Education:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2h: Physical Education:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 2i: Connections Across the Curriculum:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 3a: Integrating and Applying Knowledge for Instruction:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 3b: Adaptation to Diverse Students:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 3c: Development of Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Performance Skills:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 3d: Active Engagement in Learning:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 3e: Communication to foster learning:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 4: Assessment for Instruction:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 5a: Practices and Behaviors of Developing Career Teachers:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 5b: Reflection and Evaluation:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 5c: Collaboration with Families:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Standard 5d: Collaboration with Colleagues and the Community:
______
Met
______
Not Met
Comments:

Part II: Overall Comments

Program Strengths:

 

Program Concerns/Weaknesses:

 

General Comments:

 

Summary of Program Quality:

 

 

Part III: Recommendation for Site Visit

Recommendation for On-Site Team:

 

 

 

Part IV: ACEI's Decision

______
Program Nationally Recognized
______
Program Not Nationally Recognized
______
Program Nationally Recognized, Conditionally*
* Represents the judgement of the ACEI Reviewers that currently available assessment results, coupled with plans for gathering additional information about candidate performances, constitutes a strong case for National Recognition. In essence, the reviewers have determined that the program is expected to develop full capacity for demonstrating candidate proficiencies across the Elementary Education Standards, and to achieve unqualified National Recognition within a two-year period from the date of the review. Program faculty are expected to provide a Supplemental Program Report within that period, as the basis for confirming or denying National Recognition.

Click here to see the Reviewer's Worksheet

Click here to see the Reviewer's Rubrics

Return to ACEI home page.

This page is copyright 2002 by the Association for Childhood Education International. Please send any comments to Marilyn Gardner at aceimemb@aol.com.

Last updated April 2002