|
Elements of Standard
|
Attributes
|
Unacceptable
|
Acceptable
|
Target
|
|
Candidates know and understand number systems and number sense
|
K, S
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in the major concepts, procedures, or
reasoning processes involved in number system and number sense
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates are proficient in the major concepts, procedures, and
reasoning processes involved with pre-number concepts, whole numbers,
fractions, decimals, percents and their relationships; candidates
apply the four basic operations to solve problems and develop computational
algorithms
- Candidates apply number sequences and proportional reasoning along
with estimation and checking reasonableness of results
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates demonstrate multiple ways to explore and present number
concepts
- Candidates are fluent and flexible
- Candidates balance and connect conceptual understanding and computational
proficiency
|
|
Candidates know and understand geometry
|
K, S
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in the major concepts, procedures,
or reasoning processes involved in geometry
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates are proficient in the major concepts, procedures, and
reasoning processes of geometry to describe and model mathematical
ideas and real-world constructs, including two- and three-dimensional
shapes, visualization, spatial reasoning, transformations, and symmetry
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates demonstrate focused, coherent ways to advance their
own understanding of geometry, posing conjectures and justifying them
through reasoning and proof
|
|
Candidates know and understand measurement
|
K, S
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in the major concepts, procedures,
or reasoning processes involved in measurement
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates are proficient in the major concepts, procedures, and
reasoning processes of measurement systems including time, money,
temperature, two- and three-dimensional objects using non-standard
and standard customary and metric units
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates demonstrate the focused, coherent application of appropriate
techniques, tools, and formulas to connect measurement ideas within
mathematical areas and among other disciplines
|
|
Candidates know and understand statistics (data analysis) and probability
|
K, S
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in the major concepts, procedures,
or reasoning processes involved in statistics (data analysis) and
probability
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates are proficient in the major concepts, procedures, and
reasoning processes in data analysis and probability to formulate
questions, collect, organize, represent, analyze, and interpret data
by use of tables, graphs, and charts
- Candidates predict outcomes and conduct experiments to test predictions
in real-world situations
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates demonstrate a focused, coherent, resourceful approach
to statistics (data analysis) and probability that examines relationships
by formulating in-depth questions and designing experiments to test
outcomes using calculator and computer simulations as appropriate
|
|
Candidates know and understand algebra
|
K, S
|
Evidence shows that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in the major concepts, procedures, or
reasoning processes involved in algebra
|
Evidence shows that:
- Candidates are proficient in the major concepts, procedures, and
reasoning processes to represent mathematical situations and relationships
using algebraic symbols, patterns, relations, and functions
|
Evidence shows that:
- Candidates demonstrate a focused, coherent ability to analyze change
in various contexts as it relates to quantitative and qualitative
relationships in algebraic thinking
|
|
Candidates use major concepts, procedures, and reasoning processes
to foster K-6 student learning
|
I
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates lack proficiency in fostering K-6 student learning
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates show positive impact on K-6 student learning by:
(1) K-6 students appropriate use of patterns, quantities, and
spatial relationships across the five content areas (number systems/number
sense, geometry, measurement, algebra, statistics (data analysis)
and probability), through the processes of problem solving, reasoning,
communication, connection, and representation
(2) K-6 student use of appropriate problem solving tools, including
mental arithmetic, pencil-and-paper computation, a variety of manipulatives
and visual materials, calculators, computers, electronic information
resources, and other technologies pertinent to mathematics
(3) K-6 students understanding the history of mathematics and the
contributions of diverse cultures to that history
(4) K-6 students communicating about and through mathematics by writing
and orally using everyday language and mathematical language
(5) analyzing K-6 students mathematical preconceptions, misconceptions,
and error patterns and constructing ways for K-6 students to correct
them
|
Evidence indicates that:
- Candidates facilitate K-6 students to be focused, coherent, and
resourceful in:
(1) the appropriate use of patterns, quantities, and spatial relationships
by consistent in-depth use of problem solving, reasoning, communication,
connection, and representation of mathematical ideas
(2) the use of appropriate problem solving tools, including mental
arithmetic, pencil-and-paper computation, a variety of manipulatives
and visual materials, calculators, computers, electronic information
resources, and other technologies pertinent to mathematics
(3) understanding the history of mathematics and the contributions
of diverse cultures to that history
(4) communicating about and through mathematics by writing and orally
using everyday language and mathematical language
(5) analyzing their own mathematical preconceptions, misconceptions,
and error patterns and constructing ways to correct their own learning
|