Reviewer ID # _______

Proposal # _________

Proposal Title:___________________________________________________________

Rating: Circle the number which best corresponds to your evaluation of the proposal submitted, with 1 = significant weakness and 5 = excellent. Provide comments under each criterion to justify ratings.

1. How well does the Abstract describe the research study?

1 2 3 4 5

2. Are the Research Questions adequately defined?

1 2 3 4 5

3. Does the Rationale justify the purpose of the study and/or

place it within the context of current theory and practice?

1 2 3 4 5

4. Is the Methodology clearly described? Is the methodology well matched to the research questions?

1 2 3 4 5

5. Is the Analysis of Data adequately described or a plan of analysis presented, if the study is “in progress?”

1 2 3 4 5

6. Are the Findings clearly identified?

1 2 3 4 5

7. Are Implications for future research, classroom practices, or educational policy discussed?

1 2 3 4 5

Total ____/35

Overall evaluation:

_____Definitely accept. Proposal is excellent.

_____Accept. Proposal makes a solid contribution.

_____Accept only if space permits. Proposal has promise.

_____Reject. Proposal has one or more significant weaknesses.

I would recommend this ACEI New Orleans 2004 proposal for:

_____A Highlighted Session

_____A Forum Session

_____A Roundtable Session

_____A Poster Session